9 results for 'cat:"Settlements" AND cat:"Attorney Fees" AND cat:"Class Action"'.
J. Bolden grants the joint motion for approval of the class action settlement, ruling the lack of objection from any class members, combined with the experience of counsel and complexity of the litigation, favor approval of the settlement, which will fairly compensate members and avoid a protracted legal battle. Additionally, plaintiffs' attorneys will be granted the requested $267,000 in fees, as their calculations were reasonable and supported by evidence in the record.
Court: USDC Connecticut, Judge: Bolden, Filed On: May 10, 2024, Case #: 3:21cv1651, NOS: Consumer Credit - Other Suits, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action
J. Lipman grants customers’ unopposed motion for final approval of the proposed settlement in this case involving allegations that Family Dollar stores sold products “contaminated by a rodent infestation.” The proposed settlement was preliminarily approved, and the court now finds that notice to the class members was successful. The court will also deny without prejudice the customers’ motion for attorney fees, based on their failure to comply with certain local rules.
Court: USDC Western District of Tennessee , Judge: Lipman, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2138, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action
J. Watson grants the class's motions for approval of the settlement and for attorney fees, ruling sufficient discovery has been conducted to prove damages for the class members involved in the data breach, while the $120,000 award in attorney fees is supported by documentation and the complexity of the litigation.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Watson, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv3499, NOS: Other Personal Property Damage - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action
J. Garnett grants final approval to a $10 million settlement in a class action alleging that the window treatment company put a “discount” price on products that was actually the real price of the products. Class members who submit a claim will receive a settlement amount in cash, while class members who choose not to submit a claim will automatically receive store credit that will not expire. Class counsel is awarded just over $1.4 million, representing 14% of the settlement, which is well below the 25% benchmark set by the 9th Circuit.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Garnett, Filed On: March 4, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv8326, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action
J. Carney grants the delivery driver's counsel $191,300 in attorney fees for representing the delivery driver in his class action accusing the landscape supply company of not paying him and other employees their overtime wages, bonuses, incentives and commissions. The delivery driver's counsel requests attorney fees equal to one-third of the gross settlement amount, or approximately $266,600, but while the counsel performed adequately, they did not perform exceptionally in the straightforward wage violation case.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Carney, Filed On: January 22, 2024, Case #: 8:21cv1834, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Wu grants final approval of a $5.5 million settlement that will bring an end to a class action accusing T-Mobile of conducting background checks on its workers without proper authorization or disclosures, as well as other wage-and-hour violations under the California Labor Code. Class counsel seeks $1.8 million in fees, which is above the 25% benchmark set by the Ninth Circuit. Such above-benchmark fee awards are reserved for cases involving more litigation than was involved here. Class counsel is instead awarded $1.4 million in fees.
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Wu, Filed On: October 3, 2023, Case #: 2:21cv2268, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action
J. Griggsby approves a class action settlement and grants an award for attorney’s fees and costs in this case alleging telephone consumer protections violations by a cloud tech firm. The class of phone call recipients, claiming unlawful solicitation by the firm, was well represented by experienced counsel and presented reasonable figures for the settlement, including over $900,000 in costs alone.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Griggsby, Filed On: June 1, 2023, Case #: 8:19cv1234, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: settlements, attorney Fees, class Action